Vatican’s New Rhetoric on Poverty Masks an Old Hypocrisy
In a speech wrapped in moral grandeur but dripping with contradiction, Pope Leo XIV used the Fifth World Meeting of Popular Movements to denounce “inhuman indifference” and call on grassroots movements to repair the fractures left by modern society. Yet beneath the lofty language of justice and compassion lies a dark irony: the Vatican, an institution built on opulence and hierarchy, preaching poverty as virtue while remaining untouched by it.
A New Sermon, Same Old Theater
Pope Leo XIV invoked his namesake, Pope Leo XIII, who in 1891 penned Rerum Novarum, the Church’s first social encyclical on labor and inequality. But in 2025, this repetition feels hollow. The pontiff railed against “systems that sow death and disparity” while speaking from marble halls, guarded by Swiss soldiers and surrounded by a Church that has historically benefitted from those very systems.
He spoke of the poor being at “the center of the Gospel,” yet the institution he leads has done little to center them in practice. For decades, the Vatican has maintained investments in luxury real estate, remained silent on financial scandals, and failed to deliver transparency on child abuse reparations. When Leo XIV tells the poor that they are “hidden in the face of Christ,” it sounds less like empathy and more like detachment from the world outside Vatican walls.
Hypocrisy in the Age of AI and Opioids
The Pope’s critique of modernity, artificial intelligence, digital addiction, social media vanity, and opioid dependency paints a grim picture of humanity’s moral decay. But his condemnation is selective. He blames “bad management” for global inequality while ignoring how religious institutions, including his own, profit from the same capitalist markets that exploit the weak.
His remarks on “idolizing the body” through pharmaceutical culture could have been profound, if not for the Church’s centuries-old obsession with moralizing pain and restricting reproductive health. To call others “inhuman” while denying basic bodily autonomy to millions of women worldwide reeks of institutional arrogance.
Faith Without Accountability

Pope Leo XIV’s vision of a “poor Church for the poor” is a paradox. He praises “popular movements” for fighting exploitation, yet the Vatican remains aligned with political elites who perpetuate it. His comments about migrants being treated as “garbage” ring painfully hollow given the Church’s limited tangible action in global refugee crises.
What’s more disturbing is the pontiff’s romanticization of poverty calling land, housing, and work “sacred rights” as if holiness could feed the hungry or shelter the displaced. The Church’s sympathy is poetic, but it is not revolutionary; it soothes conscience, not systems.
Conclusion
Pope Leo XIV’s speech was not a call to arms it was a sermon of self-absolution. Cloaked in compassion yet devoid of confrontation, his message perpetuates the illusion that moral rhetoric can substitute for structural change. The Vatican’s empathy remains ornamental a halo polished by centuries of selective guilt.